I thought a privacy screen protector was a great idea – then I put one on my Galaxy S25 Ultra

Considering how much personal information we store on our phones, I wouldn’t be surprised if the demand for privacy screen protectors is at an all-time high. From bank statements to email credentials to photos and videos, the need to keep our digital footprint safe and secure, especially from the prying eyes of strangers, has never been more necessary.

Also: I replaced my iPhone 16 Pro with the Galaxy S25 Ultra – and it’s good news for Samsung

I recently gave the privacy-enhanced accessory a try, installing a variant from ESR on my Galaxy S25 Ultra. The installation process was the same as any other modern-day screen protector, with a guide tray you set your phone in for near-perfect placement. The sheet of tempered glass lay center on my phone, and the few air bubbles trapped beneath were easy to scrub off. Things were off to a great start.

The ESR screen protector worked exactly as intended; when staring at the S25 Ultra from the center, the display still looked bright, sharp, and vibrant. When I moved my head just a little bit to the left or right, the image quickly faded into black, as if the phone screen wasn’t turned on. 

The two-way privacy filter worked like magic, and for the first time in a long time, I felt comfortable answering work emails and exchanging personal messages while on the New York City subway. Even if a stranger wanted to peak, they couldn’t.

Also: My favorite USB-C accessory just got a major functionality upgrade – and it’s just as cheap

Things took a turn when I was catching up on Lakers highlights — what a time to be alive, eh? — and the display suddenly dimmed itself. Sure, my brightness setting is typically set to auto, but unless I’m moving between two drastically different lighting environments, which I wasn’t at the time, the shift in brightness should almost never be as dramatic as it was.

My first assumption was that perhaps my shadow was cast over the phone’s light sensor, causing it to dim the screen. But that wasn’t the case. Instead, the tinting from the screen protector somehow caused the phone to think that the environment was darker than it actually was. This happened throughout my first day of testing, so I eventually surrendered to light physics and turned on the adaptive brightness setting.

The second issue with the privacy screen protector was that its thickness made it difficult to register fingerprints. When paired with the S25 Ultra’s ultrasonic fingerprint sensor, which uses 3D depth mapping to scan your finger, the phone would often request a more forceful press or second attempt. I use the S25 Ultra’s ultrasonic fingerprint sensor more than the average person, as it’s essential for signing onto most of my personal services, Okta verifications for work apps, and, of course, unlocking the device.

Also: I’ve tested every Samsung Galaxy S25 model – and my favorite isn’t the Ultra

Sure, re-registering my fingerprints helped the accuracy and reliability to a degree, but not enough to make the experience of unlocking things burdenless. It got to the point where I relied more on the phone’s facial recognition to access things, which isn’t always efficient.

That’s to say, I’ve since ditched the privacy screen protector in favor of a more standard, thinner plastic film. While I can’t be as secretive about my phone usage when in public, I’ll take the scratch-resistant, viewer-friendly experience over that privilege every day of the week.