- Upgrade to Microsoft Office Pro and Windows 11 Pro with this bundle for 87% off
- Get 3 months of Xbox Game Pass Ultimate for 28% off
- Buy a Microsoft Project Pro or Microsoft Visio Pro license for just $18 with this deal
- How I optimized the cheapest 98-inch TV available to look and sound incredible (and it's $1,000 off)
- The best blood pressure watches of 2024
CIO Profile: Archie Jackson on how building teams is like parenting
Archie Jackson, senior director and head of special initiatives, corporate IT, and cybersecurity at Indian consulting and technology services firm Incedo, has had the good fortune to work with great mentors at key stages of his career. Over the years he has learned the importance of purpose — why he does what he does — and how creating an effective team can be like raising a family.
After graduating top of his class in electronics and communication engineering, Jackson joined a wiring harness manufacturing plant as an engineer where his job was to manage the IT, network, operations, and sales.
He found his first purpose when he joined the HP global tech support team where he was responsible for solving customer problems and answering them. After being rejected for his communication skills not being of international standards, he describes this as the first of his many successes.
“I gave it all I had. I remember the longest I had stayed on is for 16 hours, for a troubleshooting phone call. I was the only technical person globally who could troubleshoot the issues of HP’s first wireless printer and make it work,” Jackson recalls.
Jackson met his first mentor when he moved to DXC Technology. “Some of his words I still remember are ‘walk the talk’, ‘deserve and then desire’, ‘perform or perish’. He helped me build confidence and to remain focused to do something new, something better every day. He helped me learn how to build great teams.”
And that’s what Jackson continues to even today: “The energy and enthusiasm that keeps me going are to continue to do something new, something good, and something better each day,” he tells CIO India. Here are edited excerpts of his conversation.
CIO India: How did you begin your journey as an IT and cybersecurity leader?
Jackson: I had an opportunity to manage people at a very early stage of my career. At DXC, I was part of the pilot Global Infrastructure Services team, which had only four European clients. My mentor said he wanted a manager to lead the existing team, but instead of hiring somebody from outside, he wanted to move someone up the ladder.
He asked the team to decide on who they wanted as their leader. He created a transparent decision-making system where he chose three people from the team of 20 who would lead the team each for one month. I was the third, and I executed the focus from a client perspective, team perspective, and did all I could. Eventually, when the voting happened, it was in my favour, and I became the leader.
Within one year, I took over my mentor’s role, while he moved to the next level. The GIS team now had 45 global clients with a size of 450 people. Soon I was playing three roles in the company: one, managing the team and clients for GIS; two, presales, driving new client acquisitions; and three, program-managing the setup of global resource management. Here I interfaced with the supply chain, demand management, and forecasting.
I was reluctant to take on a leadership role initially because I always wanted to be connected with technology and had an apprehension that my time would instead go into people management. Fortunately, that did not happen. I realised that even if you’re leading people, you can always stay very well connected with technology.
CIO India: Now you are both an IT and a cybersecurity leader. How is that different from a regular CIO or CSO role?
Jackson: An IT leader would be more focused on enabling the business productivity with the help of technology , while a security leader would have fine focus towards securing the business and technology as a whole.
I’m playing multiple roles here: The primary role is taking care of the corporate IT as well as corporate security of the organization globally. Second, I’m heading the cybersecurity practice within the organization, by which I mean a business unit that provides cybersecurity services to our customers. And third, I’m part of the special initiatives and CEO office.
Being a decision-maker for IT as well as security helps me have a balanced view. Whatever I’m doing is focused on the business outcome, productivity, and performance. For instance, during an application development project or a project where some in-house applications are being worked upon, as a custodian of security, I could embed security from the inception of the project instead of taking it to the security person at the end of the project. That makes sure that everything we build has security in its DNA.
CIO India: What’s the toughest decision you’ve had to take in your IT career, and how did you make it?
Jackson: Being a leader not only means to be a people person or a great team builder, being a leader means to do the best possible in the current moment with an insightful vision of the future and the capability to change and flex in “VUCA” situations (of volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity).
Nobody had planned the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. We had multiple projects in the pipeline which were driven through on-premises applications and reliant on the office network. Many applications are required to be operated out of the office network. We had to transform the entire infrastructure.
This has been the greatest challenge because in the office we have uninterrupted and completely dedicated connectivity, fully monitored through security controls. As people moved remote, each person acted as an office, so at the end of the day we have 3,000 offices to manage. We need to make sure that the connection is secure enough and productivity doesn’t get impacted.
We were able to mitigate that risk to a very large extent by working with alternate solutions. We switched to a dedicated broadband line at each home. From a security perspective, every employee has minimal security controls on their home routers. Plus, we implemented a lot of proactive threat intelligence and advanced threat protection enablement. We also worked extensively to make sure people are aware of phishing, security, and privacy and take all basic steps to avoid any shadow IT or insider threats.
Although the first wave helped us to be proactive for future waves. Now, with the third wave, we can handle situations much more efficiently.
CIO India: What’s the best career advice you ever received?
Jackson: Once, my mentor (Nitin Seth) told me that I am a pool of creativity and I have a lot of energy that I can invest into solving problems. He suggested that instead of being like a flashlight that spreads across the entire area, I should converge my focus into specific areas like a laser, depth over breadth, and that would help me get better outcomes.
CIO India: What are the prospects for career mobility for a CIO? What roles would you aspire to?
Jackson: I usually do not work looking at designations or roles. If we are building something for the business, that’s my core focus and outcome.
Let’s say if a CSO is reporting to a CIO or a CTO, in such architectures the security-specific decision making may get influenced by more weight to technology, sometimes it would have a lesser focus on security unless a CSO has a strong say.
If there are separate roles in an organization, all of them should be at par. And both of these roles should have a seat in the board decisions.
CIO India: How do you groom the next level of leadership for the CIO role?
Jackson: I believe that we cannot grow unless we learn to take next-level capabilities and pass on our competence to our successor team. Delegation of tasks while the R (for “responsible”) and the A (“for accountable”) of RACI remains with you is something that helps build a strong team. Let the team be comfortable to commit mistakes the first time and uncomfortable if they repeat it — a slightly hard way to sharpen the saw of the team. It’s quite like parenting.
Give them the freedom to fail and come back to you with their failures. If you create a fear of failure, then they will stop being creative. However, they should not repeat the errors for which they have already been given guidance. A parallel room for failures and room for improving themselves, giving them the platform to fail and come up and share that. A bond is created if you share the risk appetite with them.
CIO India: How do you build motivation and the right culture in the IT department?
Jackson: A leader must share the learnings and the intent. To gather trust and achieve reliance from the team, it’s essential to keep them well informed. They should know what they are doing and why they are doing it.
Like Simon Sinek says, why-how-what should be the approach, but many times people approach it backwards: what, how, and then why. It’s very important to help that core DNA of thought process dissipate through them and they’ll be able to execute much better than when you were just giving them directions and asking them for the results.
I interact with employees of multiple layers of hierarchy. I allow them to act directly. If I reach out and solve problems myself, then the opportunity for them to make decisions would not be that effective.
CIO India: Looking back with 20:20 hindsight, what would you have done differently?
Jackson: Nothing differently. Everything happens for a reason. It’s either “I won” or “I’ve learned.” So both ways, it’s an opportunity. It either gives you experience or learning.
CIO India: What myths about technology, IT/IS management, digital transformation, and the CIO role would you like to debunk?
Jackson: From a security perspective, people have a lot of myths. There are multiple kinds of security professionals. One type of security professional is more into audit and compliance. They go by a set of rules and presume if it is clear, everything is secure. However, in reality, it’s not that. There is another set of people who are more into toolsets. They believe that having the best security tools makes the environment secure.
And then there is the third set of professionals who have security as a mindset. They who look at at things from architecture perspective. These are the people who break the barrier of all these such myths.
Security professionals will not be holistically successful unless they have a security mindset, where you look at situations and then take proactive measures.