- I use this cheap Android tablet more than my iPad Pro - and don't regret it
- Change these 10 iOS settings right now to instantly get better iPhone battery life
- How to clear the cache on your Windows 11 PC (and why you shouldn't wait to do it)
- These Sony headphones deliver premium sound and comfort - without the premium price
- The LG soundbar I prefer for my home theater slaps with immersive audio - and it's not the newest model
Devs gaining little (if anything) from AI coding assistants
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ab6c/6ab6cab055c2167698f0733a70d05b2c45c30a78" alt="Devs gaining little (if anything) from AI coding assistants Devs gaining little (if anything) from AI coding assistants"
“It becomes increasingly more challenging to understand and debug the AI-generated code, and troubleshooting becomes so resource-intensive that it is easier to rewrite the code from scratch than fix it.”
—Ivan Gekht, CEO, Gehtsoft
“Using LLMs to improve your productivity requires both the LLM to be competitive with an actual human in its abilities and the actual user to know how to use the LLM most efficiently,” he says. “The LLM does not possess critical thinking, self-awareness, or the ability to think.”
There’s a difference between writing a few lines of code and full-fledged software development, Gekht adds. Coding is like writing a sentence, while development is like writing a novel, he suggests.
“Software development is 90% brain function — understanding the requirements, designing the system, and considering limitations and restrictions,” he adds. “Converting all this knowledge and understanding into actual code is a simpler part of the job.”