- The 70+ best Black Friday TV deals 2024: Save up to $2,000
- One of the best cheap Android phones I've tested is not a Motorola or Samsung
- The best VPN services for iPhone: Expert tested and reviewed
- Docker Desktop 4.36 | Docker
- This 3-in-1 MagSafe dock will charge your Apple devices while keeping them cool (and for Black Friday it's only $48)
Humans are still better at creating phishing emails than AI — for now
AI-generated phishing emails, including ones created by ChatGPT, present a potential new threat for security professionals, says Hoxhunt.
Amid all of the buzz around ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence apps, cybercriminals have already started using AI to generate phishing emails. For now, human cybercriminals are still more accomplished at devising successful phishing attacks, but the gap is closing, according to security trainer Hoxhunt’s new report released Wednesday.
Phishing campaigns created by ChatGPT vs. humans
Hoxhunt compared phishing campaigns generated by ChatGPT versus those created by human beings to determine which stood a better chance of hoodwinking an unsuspecting victim.
To conduct this experiment, the company sent 53,127 users across 100 countries phishing simulations designed either by human social engineers or by ChatGPT. The users received the phishing simulation in their inboxes as they’d receive any type of email. The test was set up to trigger three possible responses:
- Success: The user successfully reports the phishing simulation as malicious via the Hoxhunt threat reporting button.
- Miss: The user doesn’t interact with the phishing simulation.
- Failure: The user takes the bait and clicks on the malicious link in the email.
The results of the phishing simulation led by Hoxhunt
In the end, human-generated phishing mails caught more victims than did those created by ChatGPT. Specifically, the rate in which users fell for the human-generated messages was 4.2%, while the rate for the AI-generated ones was 2.9%. That means the human social engineers outperformed ChatGPT by around 69%.
One positive outcome from the study is that security training can prove effective at thwarting phishing attacks. Users with a greater awareness of security were far more likely to resist the temptation of engaging with phishing emails, whether they were generated by humans or by AI. The percentages of people who clicked on a malicious link in a message dropped from more than 14% among less-trained users to between 2% and 4% among those with greater training.
SEE: Security awareness and training policy (TechRepublic Premium)
The results also varied by country:
- U.S.: 5.9% of surveyed users were fooled by human-generated emails, while 4.5% were fooled by AI-generated messages.
- Germany: 2.3% were tricked by humans, while 1.9% were tricked by AI.
- Sweden: 6.1% were deceived by humans, with 4.1% deceived by AI.
Current cybersecurity defenses can still cover AI phishing attacks
Though phishing emails created by humans were more convincing than those from AI, this outcome is fluid, especially as ChatGPT and other AI models improve. The test itself was performed before the release of ChatGPT 4, which promises to be savvier than its predecessor. AI tools will certainly evolve and pose a greater threat to organizations from cybercriminals who use them for their own malicious purposes.
On the plus side, protecting your organization from phishing emails and other threats requires the same defenses and coordination whether the attacks are created by humans or by AI.
“ChatGPT allows criminals to launch perfectly worded phishing campaigns at scale, and while that removes a key indicator of a phishing attack — bad grammar — other indicators are readily observable to the trained eye,” said Hoxhunt CEO and co-founder Mika Aalto. “Within your holistic cybersecurity strategy, be sure to focus on your people and their email behavior because that is what our adversaries are doing with their new AI tools.
“Embed security as a shared responsibility throughout the organization with ongoing training that enables users to spot suspicious messages and rewards them for reporting threats until human threat detection becomes a habit.”
Security tips or IT and users
Toward that end, Aalto offers the following tips.
For IT and security
- Require two-factor authentication or multi-factor authentication for all employees who access sensitive data.
- Give all employees the skills and confidence to report a suspicious email; such a process should be seamless.
- Provide security teams with the resources needed to analyze and address threat reports from employees.
For users
- Hover over any link in an email before clicking on it. If the link appears out of place or irrelevant to the message, report the email as suspicious to IT support or help desk team.
- Scrutinize the sender field to make sure the email address contains a legitimate business domain. If the address points to Gmail, Hotmail or other free service, the message is likely a phishing email.
- Confirm a suspicious email with the sender before acting on it. Use a method other than email to contact the sender about the message.
- Think before you click. Socially engineered phishing attacks try to create a false sense of urgency, prompting the recipient to click on a link or engage with the message as quickly as possible.
- Pay attention to the tone and voice of an email. For now, phishing emails generated by AI are written in a formal and stilted manner.
Read next: As a cybersecurity blade, ChatGPT can cut both ways (TechRepublic)