#SOOCon23: Global Cooperation Needed to Enhance Open Source Software Security
Greater international collaboration is needed in order to strengthen open source software security while retaining its benefits, was the sentiment highlighted by a panel of policymaker experts at the State of Open Con 23 conference, held in London, UK.
Work relating open sources software is already being undertaken by the US Federal government, noted Camille Stewart Gloster, deputy national cyber director, Office for National Cyber Director (ONCD) at the White House. This effort began with President Joe Biden’s zero trust executive order (EO) in May 2021, published in response to the SolarWinds supply chain attacks in late 2020.
An aspect of this EO was to better understand the products and companies within the federal government’s supply chain; for example, requirements for software vendors to provide a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) as part of their federal procurement process.
However, the EO is “just the beginning” of federal government initiatives around open source, commented Stewart Gloster. The White House realises that “software is a key component in our supply chain.”
She said the government is now engaging with industry to understand other ways it can support the open source community in strengthening cybersecurity. A notable area the government has identified is driving down the use of memory unsafe languages. Stewart Gloster said that “when a large code-base that is written in a memory unsafe language is migrated to a memory safe language, the number of software vulnerabilities can reduce by up to 70%.”
She added that the Biden administration is looking to ensure that the federal government is composed of a variety of skills and backgrounds, including technologists and engineers, to truly understand the effect of policy in areas such as open source.
“At the ONCD we’ve been very focused on how we evolve towards a digital ecosystem that is secure and resilient,” she noted.
Part of this process is “refining the role” the federal government in open source security. Stewart Gloster emphasized that the administration “wants to be informed by the community itself” and that “not everything should be done by government.”
Salem Avan, director – Policy, Strategy and Governance Division, United Nations, emphasized the need for synergies and establishing a common purpose globally around the development of open source, similar to efforts taken in areas like human rights and the environment.
It is vital to create “that baseline of things we can come together around,” Avan noted.
However, he acknowledged the difficulties around finding consensus around digital issues among the 193 UN member states. Cooperation in this area must begin at the regional level and around specific projects, he said.
“If we can get to that space then I think we can start building up the different tiers that we need in open source in a global way and maybe from that we can start building a larger coalition and consensus,” he commented.
He added that among developing nations, the legal frameworks are currently often not in place to ensure technologies like open source software can be used safely and appropriately.
Mike Bracken, founding partner, Public Digital, was keen to point out the enormous benefits and potential offered by open source software, particularly around rapid innovation and creativity. He said there is a danger of governments “rock collecting” around this issue, potentially stifling innovation.
Instead of mimicking types of regulations developed in other areas of technology, there should be an emphasis on how open source can be used positively in delivering public policy, said Bracken.
He added that the use of open source can prevent supply chain software being delivered by a small number of tech vendors.
