Understanding Network Attacks: Types, Trends, and Mitigation Strategies

At a time when digital connectivity is the lifeblood of all business operations, the specter of network attacks is greater than ever. As entities depend on complex network infrastructures, malefactors exploit vulnerabilities with growing sophistication and frequency.

Understanding the diverse nature of these threats—from DoS and DDoS attacks to reconnaissance exploits—is crucial for devising effective defense strategies. This article delves into the primary types of network attacks, offering insights into their mechanisms and practical approaches to protecting today’s networks against these ever-evolving threats.

The Rising Tide of Network Attacks

Network attacks are deliberate attempts to breach or disrupt the normal operations of a company’s network. They target everything from a network’s infrastructure to the data transmitted across it, intending to steal information, wreak havoc, or disrupt services.

Like all cybercrime, network attacks have surged in frequency and complexity in the last few years. Factors behind this rise include the increasing digitization across industries, a proliferation of connected devices, and adversaries’ growing determination and sophistication. 

Malicious actors leverage every advanced tool and technique at their disposal to exploit vulnerabilities. The bottom line? Businesses must stay vigilant and proactive in their defense strategies.

Quiet Observers and Aggressive Invaders

Network security threats can be broadly categorized into passive and active attacks. Understanding the distinction between these two is defending against them.

Passive attacks involve monitoring or eavesdropping on network traffic without directly altering it. The main aim is to gather information stealthily, which can be used in future attacks. Examples of passive attacks would be packet sniffing and traffic analysis. 

Although less disruptive, these attacks can arm attackers with valuable insights into network vulnerabilities.

On the other hand, active attacks involve direct interaction with the network to alter, disrupt, or damage it. These attacks attempt to modify data, disrupt services, or gain an unauthorized foothold on the network. Instances of active attacks include DoS attacks and zero-day exploits. 

Unfortunately, these attacks are more damaging immediately and need modern, robust defenses to lessen their impact.

Overwhelmed and Under Siege: Navigating DoS and DDoS Threats

DoS attacks are network attacks that aim to overwhelm a network, server, or service with excessive requests, making it unavailable to genuine users. DDoS attacks amplify this by using multiple systems to launch their attack, which makes it infinitely harder to defend against.

There has also been a rise in smart DDoS attacks, which require a higher level of technical expertise and understanding of network and data exchange protocols. Unlike basic attacks that rely on brute force or volume, smart attacks are more targeted and strategic, often exploiting specific vulnerabilities within a system.

These attacks focus on critical layers of a network, such as layer seven (L7), where they can be particularly damaging. While many attacks at lower layers, like L3 and L4, can be executed with minimal skills, smart attacks require a deep understanding of the network’s architecture and the ability to manipulate it effectively.

For example, a well-executed fragmentation attack can cause significant damage with minimal effort if the attacker knows how to exploit a particular vulnerability. Similarly, an attacker who understands the intricacies of a protocol can launch an attack that appears simple on the surface but is devastating due to its precision.

There are also carpet bombing attacks, a particularly destructive form of DDoS attack designed to overwhelm a network by simultaneously targeting multiple IP addresses within a range. Instead of focusing on a single point, they distribute traffic across several endpoints, making them harder to mitigate and detect. 

This approach creates widespread disruption, impacting entire networks or data centers instead of a single server. Unfortunately, the sheer volume of traffic in carpet bombing attacks can cripple network infrastructure.

Mitigating DDoS

DoS and DDoS defenses walk in parallel with access protection ideology. Preventive measures include maximizing bandwidth allocation and limiting network isolation based on traffic types. Suppose an organization’s web servers are attacked. 

In that case, isolating those in a Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) will protect the back-end network management devices, as well as other servers that have a public presence, such as mail servers. A DMZ, combined with limited privileges and roles, can be a powerful defense tactic.

In the modern cloud-based world, it could benefit a company with limited resources to seek out third-party hosting. Allowing a cloud service provider to manage data presentation services offers a little breathing room because of their control and protection at various levels in the cloud models.

Digital Doors and Physical Keys: Navigating Access Attacks

Access attacks require intrusion capabilities. These happen in many ways, from something as simple as an attacker getting their hands on an account holder’s credentials to plugging foreign hardware directly into the network infrastructure. The scope and sophistication of these attacks ranges just as wide. 

These attacks can be compared to reconnaissance in that they are either logical or physical, logical being over the internet, and physical usually leaning more towards social engineering.

The former – such as exploitation through brute force attacks or testing passwords on the network using “rainbow tables” or dictionary attacks tends to create a lot of traffic and can be easily spotted. This is why most logical access attacks are usually attempted only after sufficient reconnaissance or credentials have been obtained. 

There is also a tendency to lean on the passive side of attacking. For example, man-in-the-middle attacks to gather more information before raising too much suspicion.

The latter is physical access, which happens due to access to infrastructure or access to people. Social engineering is incredibly dangerous and challenging to defend against simply because of its effectiveness. 

The easiest type of social engineering attack involves sending out phishing emails designed to lure someone as a leverage point that enables a malicious actor to begin strategically maneuvering into the company. This can happen in many ways, but it might include someone internal to the company opening an email that contains a malicious application that helps the attacker gain access. 

These attacks work because they prey on natural human behaviors and biases to which we are all susceptible.

Mitigating Access Attacks

Protection against this type of attack comes down to network hardening. Most companies are limited to the capabilities of their equipment, so if your router is vulnerable to attack, the best course of action is to know the attack type, look for it, and set rules on your network IDS/IPS to block it. Update the firmware and software within the company’s assets and ensure that patches are up to date.

Additional steps include monitoring for activity of any recently recognized reconnaissance attacks. If attackers are researching your organization, future attack attempts are more likely. An easy answer here is to use penetration testing teams to audit the organization’s current security profile. 

The primary difference between penetration testing and red team testing is the focus of the team. A pen test team wants to know all vulnerabilities, whereas a red team wants to know if there are any at all.

Silent Stalkers: The Danger of Reconnaissance Attacks

Reconnaissance attacks involve gathering a lot of general knowledge. These efforts stem from both physical surveys and a bit of digital research. Characteristics of this information gathering can be anything from probing the network to social engineering and physical surveillance.  

Some common examples of reconnaissance attacks include packet sniffing, ping sweeps, port scanning, phishing, social engineering, and internet information queries. It is worth noting that these attacks can be preventable as well.

These can be examined further by breaking them into two categories. Logical reconnaissance refers to anything that is done in the digital arena and doesn’t require a human interaction element to be achieved. Ping sweeps and port scans, for example, are two methods of discovering both if the targeted system exists and what it is looking for on the network. 

Additionally, information queries over the internet, including leveraging public information services such as “Whois” queries, make information gathering much easier.  Of course, a Whois query exists for a legitimate purpose, but criminals exploit this for their own malicious purposes.

Physical reconnaissance depends more on the efforts required for the attacker to gain in-person access to the business. Reconnoitering the locations of security cameras, activities of guards, types of door-locking mechanisms, and patterns of life all fall into the physical reconnaissance category. 

At this point, the bad actor is going to an extreme to gain access to the company’s information structure, but there is still a threat. This type of reconnaissance is still focused only on the collection of information from any available sources. This is important when evaluating deterrents because if the surveyor cannot access the information easily, it may devalue the effort for the collection altogether or force them into a more logical realm. 

Either of these options from the surveyor would be beneficial to the network team, as it drives the reconnaissance into a more controllable atmosphere.

Mitigating Reconnaissance Attacks

When a company registers with a domain host, they have obligations to divulge some information about their organization. However, as an administrative control, much of that information can be hidden from public view. Also, limiting information presented in banners can further protect the organization.  

Additionally, it is important for the information security lead of an organization to enforce technical controls over the data by turning off unused and unnecessary ports and having firewalls in place. Training all staff about the dangers of malicious activities is quite possibly the best preventative measure against reconnaissance. 

Additionally, a company should use the services of reputable security testers, including pen testers and red team exercises. Doing so can greatly inform an organization’s information security leader of existing shortcomings. Most red teams achieve access by any means necessary, and this can truly highlight an attacker’s capabilities. 

Be sure to also conduct audits of both the logical information as well as the physical security in place. If security badges are used, access logs must be regularly reviewed to confirm that personnel are following the access agreements’ guidelines.

Addressing Evolving Tactics

As the landscape of network security evolves, so too do the tactics employed by attackers. Understanding the different types of network attacks – DoS and DDoS, access attacks, and reconnaissance attacks – is crucial for developing effective defense strategies. 

By implementing robust mitigation techniques and staying informed about emerging threats, organizations can better protect their networks and maintain operational resilience in an increasingly hostile digital environment.

Editor’s Note: The opinions expressed in this guest author article are solely those of the contributor and do not necessarily reflect those of Tripwire.